Rage sells. It always has. But somewhere between the printing press and the smartphone, we industrialized it.
Every retweet, tag, repost, or hysterical comment is a transaction. You are not engaging intellectually — you are emoting on demand, and someone is getting rewarded for it. The algorithm knows this. It has known it longer than most of us have been willing to admit. Your handheld device is not a communication tool anymore. It is a precision instrument designed to find the exact frequency of your anger and play it on a loop until you cannot imagine the world any other way.
This is not an accident. It is a business model.
Rage merchants are everywhere, and they are not limited to politics. They exist in sports media, in financial content, in academic circles, in food culture, in neighborhood Facebook groups arguing about stop signs. Every lane of modern life has its own ecosystem of professional grievance, where the goal is never resolution.
Resolution is bad for business. Outrage is renewable energy — it regenerates overnight and arrives fresh every morning with the news feed.
The process is straightforward. Find an audience. Feed them a version of reality that confirms their worst suspicions. Twist the facts just enough to fit the narrative and be sure to use terms such as “dog whistle” and “fascism.”
Then, repeat.
Civility is not part of the brand strategy because civility does not drive engagement. Contempt does. The long-term consequences of a society marinating in manufactured anger are not a concern when you are building a following. That is someone else's problem.
Then there is fake rage. Fake rage wears victimhood like a costume. It is performance art dressed up as principle. It is the public figure who claims persecution. It is the neighbor who is offended by a yard sign. It is the school board meeting that resembles a hostage negotiation. At its core, fake rage whispers the same thing to everyone who embraces it: people hate me because I am right. People fear me because I am good.
It is a seductive lie, and it requires no evidence.
When the algorithm decides what millions of people find important, independent thinking becomes collateral damage. Intellectual honesty gets tossed aside not with great drama, but quietly — one outrage cycle at a time.
If your entire worldview is built around the things you hate, something has gone so wrong that no election, verdict, or viral post will fix it. That requires something much more dramatic.
It requires a reset — and the willingness to start thinking again instead of living life as an emotional hostage captured by algorithmic merchants.
The Pennant welcomes letters to the editor and reader comments. Send correspondence to: [email protected]