Ohio got the news every governor dreams about this week. CNBC named it the No. 1 state for business in America, the first time the state has topped the ranking since the survey began in 2007. Ohio earned it the hard way, climbing 33 spots since 2010 on the strength of the nation's best infrastructure, the lowest cost of doing business, and the thing companies prize above almost everything else: shovel-ready sites they can build on without delay.
That last part is worth sitting with, because a growing number of Ohio communities are quietly working to undo it.
In Grove City, a proposed charter amendment on the November ballot would require a public vote before any large project can move forward. Ashville residents tried much the same against a specific data center before the village stopped the petition. In Pataskala and Sunbury, petitioners submitted their charter-amendment signatures the week of July 6 and are now awaiting certification by their county boards of elections; according to the Columbus Dispatch, the Pataskala petition needed at least 310 valid signatures and Sunbury's about 174, and organizers say they turned in well beyond that, including more than 450 in Sunbury.
A statewide amendment is aiming for 2027. They're all pitched as a check on data centers, but in practice, they reach much wider, because these measures are written around size, power, and water thresholds that catch any large project, from a factory to a distribution center.
Here is the problem. The single thing that made Ohio No. 1 was certainty: the promise that a company could pick a site, clear a known process, and start building. A mandatory public vote replaces that certainty with a question mark. Approval now waits on an election that is months away, and a well-funded campaign can flip it in the closing weeks. No site-selection team can plan around that, and they won't try. They'll cross the county line to a community that will simply say yes.
That's the part the "let the people decide" pitch leaves out. Capital is mobile. A city is not. When a town makes itself unpredictable, the project doesn't die — it moves, and it takes the construction jobs, the payroll, and the tax base with it. The town keeps its veto and loses the investment that the veto was supposed to govern.
We understand the instinct here. Nobody wants a project dropped on their doorstep without a say, and residents have real concerns about water, power, and traffic that deserve a real hearing. But there is a difference between a hearing and a hostage. A process that can wreck a developer's timeline on a single vote doesn't hand Ohioans more control over their future so much as less of the investment that funds it.
Ohio spent 15 years earning the right to call itself the best state in the country for business. It would be a shame to spend that title one ballot box at a time.
Questions, comments and letters to the editor are welcome at [email protected].